Um so
called in to work
The feeling..
highlights of this nightmare..
most toxic relationship on kovaze
View All Blogs
imma be negative nancy
but quick royales will break the point economy (even worse than race did).
Payouts absolutely need to be adjusted or games like outcasted and celebrities are utterly pointless to play.
8 days for 500 points?
or 10 hours for 700??? (Not including the additional 4000+ awarded to others)
Anywho.. i wont say it again, i just care about balance and this is sending me into a panic LMFAO.
ily all
Sin
Kovaze
30 votes, 315 points
Comments
Ily but i blame you for the new disastrous payouts !
300 for winner. 200 2nd place. 150 3rd. 100 4th. 75 5th, 60th? Thoughts
I mean what if only the winner got points and coins… I’d be like the real hunger games where if you don’t win you die heheh
Poof althought i think that would fix this issue, i think to have the most fun AND be fair, we just need to knock those payouts down (alot)!
i do feel like the amount of effort it took in the old version was rewarding personally but i agree with it basically being 3 times the speed now it should be lowered.
style absolutely bestie!
Rain, thank you so much for taking the time to articulate this perspective—genuinely. I want to acknowledge the emotional labor that can come with advocating for systemic balance, especially in environments where reward structures may unintentionally privilege speed over sustained engagement. What you’re highlighting here speaks to a broader equity concern within the point economy. When shorter-duration experiences yield disproportionately higher rewards compared to long-form commitments, it can create an imbalance that not only impacts player motivation, but also devalues time investment and strategic endurance. That tension is absolutely valid to name. Your comparison really underscores this disparity—when 8 days of consistent participation yields less than a fraction of what can be earned in a significantly shorter timeframe, it raises important questions about fairness, accessibility, and the kind of gameplay behaviors that are being incentivized. Systems like this don’t just exist in a vacuum—they actively shape the way people engage, compete, and feel valued within the space. At the same time, I hear the care behind your words. This isn’t just frustration—it’s a desire for sustainability, for a system where all formats feel meaningful and worth engaging in. That kind of feedback is essential for growth. Also, just to gently ground this: your panic is valid, but you’re not alone in noticing this, and conversations like this are how balance evolves. So thank you for speaking up, even if you “won’t say it again.” Appreciate you, truly 💛
Tayvie this ai slop I’m crying
Tayvie i am dead.
Tayvie LMFAOOOOOO
disagree I love being rewarded
hwest14 ofcourse you do! lol im speaking for everyone to try and keep all games fair or atleast slightly balanced. You should want every game to feel worthy of playing!
everything should be cut in half/one third
Adam agree!!
Adam
Adam yeah the current payouts halved seem more appropriate for the current speed
Tbh im down for a lower point prize for royale if we keep 1 day royales like idk... this is peak
Lifeiscool agree!
Lifeiscool one day royale's are sooo much better fr
no it's true...
Royale was already a huge culprit of point inflation but with the decrease in run time now it's gonna be a MAJOR point inflation issue. It needs to be cut down to like 300-400 points MAX
itsamodernlife absolutely bestie you get it. It bothered me before, but now that its shorter games, PANICCC
This is tea wait
Bagelita ty queen i thought id be attacked lol