Made no noise. That chopped rat is so washed

I’m joining every hysteria that fills today. Come join me in this challenge. #snowday

I'm a cool kid now

adam

#LewHoney 1 - Hysteria 0

shittest album of the year 💩💩💩 and little monsters are all ugly!

mid trash adc unplayable im over it

l*dy g*** lost every big 4 nomination last night I HAVE TO LAUGH her fans are the most obnoxious thing to ever exist and then they have to swallow their pride rn like it’s so delicious what a start of a week for me!

Jury Vote Rank who should win from top to bottom. 1. honey 2. Jason212 3. JACK_O_LANTERN 4. Lewis 5. benja31 6. Akshar 7. Christos soobin robbeddddd

Cherry thank you, for being a prime example as to why critical thinking is on a decline in the US of A. Because why did I wake up to this stupid boar saying I broke the "multiple designs in one design" rule with my makeup designs? https://kovaze.com/designs/6473 DOES THIS LOOK LIKE MULTIPLE DESIGNS TO YOU? DOES THIS LOOK LIKE EYES, LIPS AND MAKEUP IN ONE DESIGN? Cherry my god you make me PROUD to be a Canadian

until last night. Now, I don't really have a desire to continue to play much. I was already have a really anxious day yesterday IRL, but the ONE thing I was looking forward to (makeup designs) was suddenly and abruptly ruined. And I just cant help but think there was just other motives behind it. Who gets to "decide" on design rules? Clearly, this was not Sin 's decision and the "design mod" stated it was "discussed between other mods".... well WHO? Who got to decide on this new and sudden rule? Was it someone who also creates designs? Was it someone who also participates in the shop game? I guess we will never know. However, seems like a huge conflict of interest to me. "Rules and restrictions" should be consistent. There is no consistency, especially within the design rules. And at the end of the day- why is the hill someone wants to die on about makeup that makes the atrocious base skin look 500% better? Kinda weird. I guess we would rather see the same 20 designs in shops week after week, because that is what it has turned in to. We won't even get into how allowing 40 one-stock items has also caused a HUGE issue with shops ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Looking over the designs and shops today, we see full outfits classified as "accessories", interesting. We see a "clothing" design that encompasses clothes, shoes, and 5 accessories all bundled into 1 (which apparently is not against the rules, maybe because it benefits certain people?). Consistency. Either allow designs to "overflow" into 2 categories: EX clothes accessory, clothes shoes, shoes accessory, eyes lips, glasses lips, etc..... OR no overlap at all. Consistency. I had high hopes for Kovaze, but time and time again feedback and suggestions from myself and many others goes unacknowledged. After awhile, it becomes apparent that there is only a few who really "matter", and those few almost always have ulterior motives. I am seeing no difference in moderation here that I saw on Tengaged since 2010. Users that actively use a website and its features, should not moderate their peers.

If you get a chance in between polishing miss Royale, Hysteria fill at 11/11 could be a good test. The girls just aren't filling it like they should and it's currently the most fun quick game on the site. With Love, PosterBoy

FUCK ICE.

115 points and I’ll send in my screenshot of them calling me a bad word !! I’m getting her ASS ! DakotaMagic better hide bitch !

In recent weeks, there has been a rising trend of moderation being blamed for enforcing rules that the community and I have set. On the previous website, that was understandable because the moderators were not supervised. On this platform, I am actively ensuring that moderation is acting in accordance with the rules they are set to enforce, and I am here to appeal any decisions or handle any complaints users may have against moderators. Yes, it would be nice if we could have “third-party moderators,” but we do not have a UFO that can abduct random netizens and force them to moderate our platform. So for now, we’re making do with what we have: a team of moderators (supervised by me) who have done a reasonably decent job of keeping this platform safe and allowing me to focus on development of the website. As for design rules, which have recently become a hot topic: they have been in place for some time, and the recent moderation decision to not permit full-face designs is in accordance with the rules that were set. After reviewing the issue of Brookie’s makeup designs, I stated I would be allowing them while I had a discussion around the design rules. The moderators did not “create rules” that did not exist and do not have a hidden agenda, as some of the conspiracies being floated around are claiming. TL;DR: If you want to take your anger out on somebody, blame me. I’m the only person who should be held responsible for how well this website is running. The moderators are volunteers and owe me nothing. If they are lacking direction, it is because I did not provide it. I am a bit spread thin at the moment and I apologise for that, working on Royale, Valentine’s Flames, etc., but I am more than happy to spend my time refining design rules if that is what the website feels is important at this moment.

Most faithful gucci jdaddy icebeast jadennator1 marwane hwest14 #theothergucci pureessence envious jtee Most traitor

second ever non-Sin blog to make it to 1000 points being a hate post about u gotta sting a little

what does it say about me

medusaluh i remember us having a massive fallout on survivor on the *redacted* site, but i love you so much you are on my best friends here, specifically my favourite Australian <3 Lewis literally remember our first game on *redacted*, and you just used me as a pawn, but then we ended up being best friends and one of the very small few that has me on social media <3 christos I don't have any old memories of you because I don't think we met to literally recently but I can tell you are super loyal and its fun chatting to you on DC and in survivorrrr <3 antonB another user I have a lot history with, have always had a great relationship and i always remember how nice you were to me on *redacted* and still are on this site, and we are alwayssss in games together coz we are in the same timezone <3

and i’ll tell you which user i confuse you with sometimes (if any) ethan - evan rebranding - envious mezcal - doom cristi - no one queen, there’s only one you

Morgan always told me great things about you Mackey. In her words you were, 'mom'. this hate is misdirected.

I was thinking more about the long game "arena" style game. I would LOVE for there to be a format like CUT THROAT where you stay in 3 teams the entire game. I think starting with either 8 per team or 10 per team would be great. If we started with 10 per team there could be a purge day where bottom player from each team is eliminated. Winning team is safe. The other two teams nominate 1 player from the other losing team to face off into elimination. (To speed up these decisions you would have to select the player from each of the other two teams you would want to send into elimination before the previous DC is over, so no matter the result of who wins decisions are locked in for each scenario) Then for the remaining players that make the final challenge I think this would make it the most unique and most authentic to the challenge: The final would consist of every single comp. Every member from every team plays each comp. The scores are averaged, and then each comp gets awarded points for placement. SO if blue team ranked 1st for Flags, 2nd for chain, 3rd for deal... .etc. then their total ranked points would be their finale score and the team with the best (lowest) score wins. Knowing the finale is about well rounded players, you would make strategic decisions with your team. Having to nominate prior to knowing who wins the comp would make your team have to decide if they wanted to swing big for players, or play it safer with players that might be 'easier to beat'. Also not knowing which comp is next would make it interesting. This is what would make it not all about taking out weak player since you couldn't vote for players on your own team.

when you can just be a hot irl

Todays theme: Usernames i like! Malibu matcha dino Onyx PosterBoy BRAT DK Metropolis Chibi Bagel Jaded Arris Texas Lunk Pizza Tobeerix Snaxets Rebranding ElectraViv toad THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER

the lower your comp scores are, the hotter you are IRL