It's not classy to put gay corn actors in my illustrious reality star pyn. let's clean that up Mamas.

Just had to go dog searching as my dog got out the little rascal but got him hope you're all doing well ❤️

LEwis

someone tell her who i am. istg.

maxora smores_poptart

by smores_poptart

hope thats okay. if it isnt, im sorry! maxora

And I'll tell you if i stan or if they're a chop Andrea Boehlke - STAN thats mama MaxOra Stacey Rusch - Next up what do you think of cantaloupe shrimp? Jaded Aviva Drescher - She's white trash quite frankly, but its impossible to hate this camp queen. Sprite LEwis - ?? i stan you but you're not on tv sister.. unless you are..? confused. Lewis Kim Woodburn - Goddess we stan Malibu Joey Mills - Chop that is not a classy girl. MaxOra Kiki Barth - Very classy gorgeous and humble. No choice but to stan and admire her natural charisma. Azah Timothy Champagne - Chop queer bate with 0 stroke game. edmxxnd

makeup/accessories moderation conflict of interest full face plumber discourse Republicans?? FUCK ICE Sin apology blog repeat

can’t fly down here with me

i love seong

Built it brick by brick

i can make that dick go fuckin gratatatata

from another user on this website (i wont name their name) asking if a full body avatar bent over like a plumber with its full asshole exposed is against the design rules does anyone know who i can direct this question to for my friend?

If you get a chance in between polishing miss Royale, Hysteria fill at 11/11 could be a good test. The girls just aren't filling it like they should and it's currently the most fun quick game on the site. With Love, PosterBoy

FUCK ICE.

115 points and I’ll send in my screenshot of them calling me a bad word !! I’m getting her ASS ! DakotaMagic better hide bitch !

In recent weeks, there has been a rising trend of moderation being blamed for enforcing rules that the community and I have set. On the previous website, that was understandable because the moderators were not supervised. On this platform, I am actively ensuring that moderation is acting in accordance with the rules they are set to enforce, and I am here to appeal any decisions or handle any complaints users may have against moderators. Yes, it would be nice if we could have “third-party moderators,” but we do not have a UFO that can abduct random netizens and force them to moderate our platform. So for now, we’re making do with what we have: a team of moderators (supervised by me) who have done a reasonably decent job of keeping this platform safe and allowing me to focus on development of the website. As for design rules, which have recently become a hot topic: they have been in place for some time, and the recent moderation decision to not permit full-face designs is in accordance with the rules that were set. After reviewing the issue of Brookie’s makeup designs, I stated I would be allowing them while I had a discussion around the design rules. The moderators did not “create rules” that did not exist and do not have a hidden agenda, as some of the conspiracies being floated around are claiming. TL;DR: If you want to take your anger out on somebody, blame me. I’m the only person who should be held responsible for how well this website is running. The moderators are volunteers and owe me nothing. If they are lacking direction, it is because I did not provide it. I am a bit spread thin at the moment and I apologise for that, working on Royale, Valentine’s Flames, etc., but I am more than happy to spend my time refining design rules if that is what the website feels is important at this moment.

here for a reason and if people actually have valid ideas and concerns they should just communicate with them. Alot of people are saying things shouldn't be this or that but these things are also not actual valid concerns they are suggestions for the site. remember guys opinions exist and you not liking a way something is does not mean its like a bad thing.

Most faithful gucci jdaddy icebeast jadennator1 marwane hwest14 #theothergucci pureessence envious jtee Most traitor

second ever non-Sin blog to make it to 1000 points being a hate post about u gotta sting a little

what does it say about me

medusaluh i remember us having a massive fallout on survivor on the *redacted* site, but i love you so much you are on my best friends here, specifically my favourite Australian <3 Lewis literally remember our first game on *redacted*, and you just used me as a pawn, but then we ended up being best friends and one of the very small few that has me on social media <3 christos I don't have any old memories of you because I don't think we met to literally recently but I can tell you are super loyal and its fun chatting to you on DC and in survivorrrr <3 antonB another user I have a lot history with, have always had a great relationship and i always remember how nice you were to me on *redacted* and still are on this site, and we are alwayssss in games together coz we are in the same timezone <3

am the imposter in "among us" and someone calls an emergency meeting and asks me what i was doing during that round (PIC INSIDE)

Morgan always told me great things about you Mackey. In her words you were, 'mom'. this hate is misdirected.

an issue with a moderator, you can raise an admin support ticket on the Discord Server. I will no longer entertain this on the blogs page.

I was thinking more about the long game "arena" style game. I would LOVE for there to be a format like CUT THROAT where you stay in 3 teams the entire game. I think starting with either 8 per team or 10 per team would be great. If we started with 10 per team there could be a purge day where bottom player from each team is eliminated. Winning team is safe. The other two teams nominate 1 player from the other losing team to face off into elimination. (To speed up these decisions you would have to select the player from each of the other two teams you would want to send into elimination before the previous DC is over, so no matter the result of who wins decisions are locked in for each scenario) Then for the remaining players that make the final challenge I think this would make it the most unique and most authentic to the challenge: The final would consist of every single comp. Every member from every team plays each comp. The scores are averaged, and then each comp gets awarded points for placement. SO if blue team ranked 1st for Flags, 2nd for chain, 3rd for deal... .etc. then their total ranked points would be their finale score and the team with the best (lowest) score wins. Knowing the finale is about well rounded players, you would make strategic decisions with your team. Having to nominate prior to knowing who wins the comp would make your team have to decide if they wanted to swing big for players, or play it safer with players that might be 'easier to beat'. Also not knowing which comp is next would make it interesting. This is what would make it not all about taking out weak player since you couldn't vote for players on your own team.

when you can just be a hot irl